• Pyramids
  • Map
  • Library
  • Tags
  • About
  • EN
    ruen
  1. Home page
  2. Pyramids
  3. Pyramid of Khafre

Pyramid of Khafre

Description: While the Pyramid of Khafre is only a few meters lower than the Great Pyramid it is as good as the latter one. Despite the fact that the Pyramid of Khafre is located in the middle of the Giza Plateau it has not been well researched yet. We know that inside the Great Pyramid a few rooms and passages have been discovered, however, all rooms inside the Pyramid of Khafre are located below its base level. All the attempts to find any chambers in the pyramid’s masonry have ended in failure. But could it be possible, that this huge monument is just a "pile of stones"? The Pyramid of Khafre, together with the Great Sphinx of Giza, and the standing structures of the temples could give us the full understanding of the ancient pyramid complex.
Alternative names: Second Pyramid,Pyramid of Chephren (Khefren)
Lepsius No: 8
Type: True Pyramid
Location: Giza Plateau
Country: Egypt

Show on map


ParametersStudiesLibraryPhotosFiles3D-model

History of archaeological exploration

Year 430 BCE: Herodotus, an ancient Greek historian, first mentions the Pyramid of Chephren in his first full-length historical work ‘Histories’: 'This Cheops, the Egyptians said, reigned fifty years; and after he was dead his brother Chephren succeeded to the kingdom. This king followed the same manner as the other, both in all the rest and also in that he made a pyramid, not indeed attaining to the measurements of that which was built by the former (this I know, having myself also measured it), and moreover there are no underground chambers beneath nor does a channel come from the Nile flowing to this one as to the other, in which the water coming through a conduit built for it flows round an island within, where they say that Cheops himself is laid: but for a basement he built the first course of Ethiopian stone of divers colours; and this pyramid he made forty feet lower than the other as regards size, building it close to the great pyramid. These stand both upon the same hill, which is about a hundred feet high. And Chephren they said reigned fifty and six years’.

Year 60-30 BCE: Diodorus Siculus, an ancient Greek historian, writes the following about the Pyramid in his ‘Bibliotheca Historica’: 'Upon the death of this king his brother Chephren​ succeeded to the throne and ruled fifty-six years; but some say that it was not the brother of Chemmis, but his son, named Chabryes, who took the throne. All writers, however, agree that it was the next ruler who, emulating the example of his predecessor, built the second pyramid, which was the equal of the one just mentioned in the skill displayed in its execution but far behind it in size, since its base length on each side is only a stade.​ And an inscription on the larger pyramid gives the sum of money expended on it, since the writing sets forth that on vegetables and purgatives for the workmen there were paid out over sixteen hundred talents. The smaller bears no inscription but has steps cut into one side. And though the two kings built the pyramids to serve as their tombs, in the event neither of them was buried in them’.

1610: George Sandys, an English traveller, visited the pyramids and agreed with the assumption that they were the tombs of kings.

1637: John Greaves, an English scholar, traveller and professor of astronomy at Oxford University, visited Cairo twice, where he explored and took measurements of the pyramids on the Giza Plateau. After his journey, Greaves reported his observations in his book ‘Pyramidographia’. He disagreed with the view that the pyramids had been built by biblical characters or legendary kings. Based on classical sources, Greaves concluded that the Pyramids had been built by Cheops, Chephren and Menkaure as tombs. He noted that the blocks used in the construction of the Pyramid of Chephren were not as large or as regular as those in the Great Pyramid, but their surface was smooth - no bumps or cracks, except for the blocks on the south side. Most likely, the casing of the Pyramid of Chephren was removed between Greaves’ last visit and 1692, when Benoit de Maillet mentions the casing as remaining only at the summit.

1692-1708: Benoit de Maillet, a French diplomat, Consul-General in Cairo, traveller and naturalist, describes that the casing of the Pyramid was only preserved at its summit.

1707-1726: Claude Sicard, a French Jesuit missionary, traveller, explorer and antiquarian, traveling through Egypt documented twenty major pyramids, twenty-four surviving temples, and over fifty decorated tombs.

1799: Dominique Vivant Denon, Jomard and Malus, as part of Napoleon's expedition to Egypt, drafted a brief description and made some sketches of the pyramids at Giza.

1817: Giovanni Battista Caviglia, an Italian explorer, searched for the entrance to the Pyramid, but to no avail.

1818: Giovanni Battista Belzoni, an Italian traveller and discoverer, was the first in modern times to enter the chamber of the Pyramid of Chephren through the upper entrance on its north side. Having cleared the rubble from the chambers, Belzoni described the interior of the Pyramid with detailed drawings. He discovered a granite sarcophagus in the burial chamber, which appeared to be filled only with earth and stones. The bones in the rubble were not found until the day after the Pyramid was discovered, but after being sent to London, it was determined that they were bones of a bull. Closer examination of the burial chamber revealed traces of ancient and medieval treasure hunters, including an iron hammer, and Coptic, Demotic and Arabic inscriptions on the walls. To secure his priority, Belzoni left a huge inscription on the wall: ‘Scoperta da G. Belzoni. 2. mar. 1818' (Discovered by G. Belzoni on 2 March 1818).

1837: Howard Vyse, a British major, together with John Shae Perring, a British engineer and Egyptologist, were the first to carry out the extensive measurement and exploration of the structure, chambers and surroundings of the Pyramid. They found the other, lower entrance to the Pyramid, which was blocked from the inside by three granite blocks. Vyse and Perring cleared the corridor by blowing up the granite plugs that blocked it, cleared the yard on the eastern side of the Pyramid and reported the ruins of the base of the satellite pyramid on the south side of the Pyramid. Perring believed that the two great pyramids on the Giza Plateau had already been breached in antiquity, even before the Arabs ruled, and that this was mentioned in a source from Dionysius Telmaghre. He suggested that the Arabs had got inside the Pyramid of as early as 1196-1197, the same time they had breached the Pyramid of Menkaure.

1842-1843: Karl Richard Lepsius, a German archaeologist and Egyptologist, carried out archaeological excavations of Egyptian pyramids, including the Pyramid of Chephren. Between 1849 and 1856 his monumental twelve-volume work ‘Denkmaeler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien’ was published with many drawings and layout sketches of the pyramids and tombs on the Giza Plateau. Lepsius recorded the Pyramid in the list of Egyptian pyramids under number VIII (8).

1853-1858: Francois Auguste Ferdinand Mariette, a French archaeologist and Egyptologist, the founder of the Egyptian Antiquities Department, excavated the lower temple (valley temple) of Chephren buried in the sand. While clearing the temple, he blew up some of the large structural elements that had collapsed, to remove them from the temple and ensure safety. Regretfully, Mariette published practically nothing about what he had found inside the temple. However, in a small hole in the floor of the temple he was lucky to discover a magnificent diorite statue of Khafre (Chephren) seated on a throne and the lower part of a diorite dyad - Khafre seated with the goddess Bastet.

1880-1882: William Matthew Flinders Petrie, a British Egyptologist, conducted archaeological studies and took certain accurate measurements of the pyramids on the Giza Plateau including the Pyramid of Chephren. Petrie determined the position of the burial chamber relative to the vertical axis of the Pyramid, and corrected Perring’s measurements. While examining the outer enclosing wall to the west of the Pyramid, he discovered the workers' barracks. A coin dated back to the reign of Sultan an-Nasir Hasan (1347-1361) was found under the south-eastern part of the pavement. Since this sultan's mosque is said to have been built with pyramid stones, this coin suggests that some of the stones for the construction were taken from the base of the Pyramid of Chephren. Petrie mentions that at the time of Palerma (1581) and Albinus (1591) the Pyramid's casing was intact, but at the time of the traveller Sandys (1611) the casing was only at the top of the Pyramid.

1909-1910: Uvo Hölscher, a German architect and Egyptologist, as part of the expedition of Ernst von Sieglin, a German antiquities enthusiast, patron of culture and philanthropist, conducted a large-scale excavation and research of the Chephren Pyramid complex. The aim of the research was to identify the architectural features of the temples and their artistic design. Hölscher investigated the lower and upper temples, the causeway, and cleared the satellite pyramid. He was the first to understand the true purpose of the lower temple (valley temple) of Chephren. The results of the excavations, drawings and restoration were published in 1912 in the first volume titled ‘Das Grabdenkmal Des Königs Chephren', the six-volume work ‘Veröffentlichungen Der Ernst Von Sieglin Expedition in Ägypten’, whose editor was the patron of the expedition himself, Ernst von Sieglin.

1929-1939: Selim Hassan, an Egyptian archaeologist commissioned by Cairo University, organised the first expedition on a scale comparable to those of his foreign colleagues. Hassan’s expedition cleared the mastabas and tombs carved into the rocks of the central area between the Sphinx and the Pyramid of Chephren, as well as the causeway. While clearing the area around the upper temple, Hassan discovered five boat pits on its north and south sides and a deep cleft in the rock on the north-south axis, which he identified as the sixth boat pit. This is the first time that so many boat pits have been found near a single pyramid. The results of his excavations were published in a ten-volume monumental work ‘Excavations at Giza’.

1952: Jacques Vandier, a French Egyptologist, examined the Pyramid of Chephren and made some measurements which were described in his multi-volume ‘Manuel d'Archéologie Égyptienne’.

1960: Abd el-Al Hafeez, an Egyptian archaeologist, while clearing the area around the satellite of the Pyramid of Chephren on its western side, discovered a serdab enclosed by three limestone slabs. Inside the serdab, Hafeez found a wooden box with fragments of cedar wood, which was once a piece of furniture. Later, researchers were able to assemble the fragments and it turned out that the wooden object was a frame in the shape of a 'sah netjer’, or ‘divine box’, for transporting the statue.

1966: Vito Maragioglio and Celesta Ambrogio Rinaldi, Italian architects, published detailed descriptions and large-scale drawings of the interior and exterior of the Pyramid as a follow-up to their two-decade exploration of the Memphis pyramids. They mention that at the time of Jean Chesneau's journey (1548), the Pyramids of Chephren and Menkaure were for the most part still encased.

1967: Luis Walter Alwarez, a Nobel Prize-winning American physicist, explored the Pyramid of Chephren using the muon method. The purpose of the exploration was to look for hidden chambers inside the Pyramid, but the results suggested that there were no cavities.

1974: Ain Shams University worked with the Stanford Research Institute (USA) to conduct electromagnetic sounder experiments at the Pyramids of Giza to search for hidden chambers and voids in and around the pyramids. The study was to no avail because the limestone in both of these large pyramids has a high radio frequency loss due to the high moisture content of the limestone.

1991 until now: Zahi Hawass, and Mark Lehner, Egyptian and American archaeologists respectively, under the auspices of ’Ancient Egypt Research Associates (AERA)’ have been studying the Giza Plateau, including the Pyramid of Chephren.

1995-1996: Zahi Hawass, an Egyptian archaeologist, cleared the area to the east of the valley temple, discovering ramps that cross a narrow corridor or channel running from north to south. In front of the Sphinx Temple the canal runs into a drain leading north-east, probably to the embankment buried below the modern tourist square.

2018: Gilles Dormion, a French architect, and Jean-Yves Verd'hurt, published a book about their research into the interior of the Pyramid of Chephren. In their book, they study the design features thoroughly, and point out the possibility of a hidden chamber inside the Pyramid.

2018: Upon consent of the Egyptian authorities, a photogrammetric survey was carried out by the French company Iconem, commissioned by Label News for a documentary, ‘Pyramids: Solving the Mysteries’. The architectural consultant was the French engineer and architect Franck Monnier.

Field studies
    Electromagnetic Sounder Experiments at the Pyramids of Giza

    In 1974, Ain Shams University (Egypt) worked with the Stanford Research Institute (USA) to conduct electromagnetic sounder experiments at the Pyramids of Giza to search for hidden chambers and voids in and around the pyramids. Special echo sounders operating in the frequency range of 10 to 150 MHz were developed for the survey. The idea was that the pyramids might be a suitable low-loss medium for the underground propagation of radio waves because the Giza Plateau area is extremely dry, with less than an inch of precipitation per year. The transmitting and receiving antennae were placed near the south wall of the lower (additional) chamber so that the energy could propagate through the rock towards the burial chamber for a distance of 68 m. A second receiving antenna was similarly placed on the wall of the Burial Chamber to receive one-way energy through the rock. The receiving oscilloscope and camera were positioned in the burial chamber. The analysis of the data showed that no detectable signal was received through the 68 m thickness of the rock between the lower chamber and the burial chamber at frequencies below 20 MHz. A second set of experiments was carried out to study the one-way and two-way pulse propagation between the burial chamber and the faces of the Pyramid of. However, this survey was also unsuccessful. Another research at the Great Pyramid has definitively confirmed that the limestone of both of these large pyramids has a high radio frequency loss due to the high moisture content of the limestone.
    Date: 1974
    Researcher: Ain Shams University, Stanford Research Institute

    Electromagnetic sounding of the Giza Plateau (Egypt)

    In 1994, a 3D model of the electrical resistivity of the rocks down to a depth of 150 m was developed based on pulse electromagnetic sounding of the Sphinx and the Pyramid of Chephren. The aim of the research was to assess the configuration of aquifers and groundwater reservoirs in the vicinity of the Sphinx. The survey was carried out by the Geoelectromagnetic Research Centre at the Institute of Physics of the Earth, the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow). The results showed that the maximum thickness of the dense limestone is located beneath the southern face of the Pyramid of Chephren, the base of which is 65 m above sea level. The dense limestone beneath the Pyramid is over 160 m thick, while near the Sphinx, whose base is 25 m above sea level, it is about 80 m.
    Date: 1994
    Researcher: Барсуков П.О., Файнберг Э.Б.

    Search for Hidden Chambers in the Pyramids

    In 1967, Luis Walter Alwarez, a Nobel Prize-winning American physicist, explored the Pyramid of Chephren using the muon method. The aim of the research was to find any hidden chambers inside the Pyramid's body, as all the known interior chambers are concentrated at the base of the Pyramid. The research was carried out by the University of California and Ain Shams University (Egypt). The results confirmed the absence of previously unknown voids in the Pyramid of Chephren, whose volume could match the explored chambers in the Great Pyramid. However, as the equipment was placed in the burial chamber, and the surveyed volume (the visible volume was determined by the vertically oriented cone) of the Pyramid was only 19%, remaining 81% might conceal voids still unknown to us.
    Date: 1968
    Researcher: Alwarez L.W., Andreson J.A.

Laboratory studies
    Analysis of samples of ferruginous rocks from the 'boat pits' of the Pyramid of Khafre

    In November 2011, the expedition of Laboratory of Alternative History (LAH) took samples from boat pits No. 3, 4, 5 and 6 near the Chephren Pyramid in order to determine the composition and nature of the rocks from the walls and bottom of the pits, where potential anomalies in the form of black and red rock outcrops emerged from the normal limestone.
    Gold, platinum, ruthenium, as well as strontium and uranium were found along with the quartz grains, celestine and barite crystals that are common in the Giza area. The pure ruthenium and chromium found are the most interesting finds. Ruthenium (Ru) is a very rare platinum-group metal. The technology for separating ruthenium from associated metals is a very sophisticated one, and its use in Ancient Egypt is ruled out. Nowadays pure ruthenium has a very specific application - in aerospace engineering and as a selective catalyst in chemical reactions. It can also be used as a film coating to improve the chemical resistance and/or electrical properties of products, to sorb and produce ultra-pure hydrogen. In most cases, ruthenium is not used in its pure form, but rather in alloys and chemical compounds. There are no ‘domestic’ applications for ruthenium. Therefore, modern-time contamination of a sample with pure ruthenium is highly unlikely. Chromium (Cr) never occurs in a free state in nature. Chromium metal is short-lived in natural conditions, which is why the most likely route for it to get into ancient specimens is through modern-time contamination. It should be noted, however, that certain precautions were taken against sample contamination, and since chromium was found in several samples, its presence cannot be definitively attributed to present-day contamination. This issue requires further examination.
    Date: 2011
    Researcher: НИЦ Лаборатория Альтернативной Истории

    Radiocarbon Dates of Old and Middle Kingdom Monuments in Egypt (Pyramid of Khafre)

    Between 1984 and 1995, more than 450 organic specimens were collected from monuments built in the Old and Middle Kingdoms. The most suitable samples have been selected for dating. The objective is to establish a radiocarbon chronology of the monuments. This chronology has been compared with the historical chronology established through the reconstruction of written sources. The analysis of 25 samples obtained from the Pyramid of Khafre suggests that the average age of the samples and presumably the Pyramid itself is 4173 years (ranging from 3975 to 4511 years). The reign of Pharaoh Khafre, to whom the Pyramid is attributed, is dated 2558-2532 BCE according to the chronology by P.A. Clayton (1994).
    Date: 1984-1995
    Researcher: Bonani G., Haas H., Hawass Z., Lehner M.

    The Stones of the Pyramids: Provenance of the Building Stones of the Old Kingdom Pyramids of Egypt

    About 1,500 samples from the pyramids and quarries of the Old Kingdom were analysed by geochemical and petrographic test methods in order to identify the provenance of the building material of the pyramids. The research showed that the limestone used to build the core of most of the pyramids had been mined in quarries found quite nearby.
    The core the Pyramid of Chephren (Khafre) correlate well with those from various quarries at Giza. Major part of the masonry used in the construction of the Pyramid is virtually identical to that of the Pyramid of Cheops and therefore, the material must have been extracted from the same sources. This is particularly true for the large area of the quarry, which covers the distance from the asphalt road between the Sphinx and the Pyramid of Cheops on the north side to the causeway in the south. However, it appears that during the construction of the Pyramid of Chephren, most of the stone material was extracted from the eastern parts of the main quarry area known today as the ‘Central Deposit’. Some of the stones were brought from the site of Hitan el-Gurob.
    The provenance of the backing stones and fine limestone casing stones was also determined. At least 90% of the surface of the Pyramid of Chephren was originally covered in fine whitish grey limestone of excellent quality. Analyses have shown that the Mokattam quarry area as a source of casing material should be excluded. After comparing the Pyramid’s limestone with samples from the Tura and Maasara region, there is no doubt that the stones were quarried in these areas, but the maximum match is with the Tura quarries. The granite casing stones in the lower courses were extracted in various quarries south of Aswan.
    Date: 2010
    Researcher: Klemm D., Klemm R.

  • Pyramids
  • Map
  • Library
  • Tags
  • About
  • t.me/learnpyramids
  • 16Gtfh9EcweasYZv9yc2KESVkwkWY4sC56

  • 0xfEA55276811EFFf9ed51BACdf7e2f503B047e087